Tagged ‘commentary’

Observation on Museums

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011

I'll preface this by saying that maybe this opinion is largely the way it is because I'm a (relatively) young person.

I'm a member of both the Metropolitan Museum of Art ("The Met" for short here in New York City) and the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA). I started with MoMA membership a year ago and decided to renew this year. The MoMA is a cool place to hang out, has lots of exhibitions of interest to me, and is pretty accessible to my house by train. This year, I decided to get a membership to The Met. I was mostly attracted by the Alexander McQueen exhibit (I won't lie to you, the opportunity to skip to the members line and avoid a 2+ hour wait was appealing) but I've been to The Met many times before and there are some pieces of their permanent collection that really speak to me. Additionally, I discovered that they have a killer roof deck that overlooks Central Park.

That said, I don't make use of these memberships nearly enough. I wish I could find more time to go, particularly during members-only hours when I could really make the best use of my membership in avoiding the herds of tourists. However, I've noticed some differences in how these museums speak to me as a member and thought it might make interesting fodder for my blog (which, I know, I haven't updated in quite a few months).

I find that MoMA is a lot better at asking for money than The Met is; and I should mention that this doesn't mean that MoMA contacts me more frequently about it. Actually, the reverse is true! I get a lot of mail from The Met asking me for money and I just became a member in August of this year. I would understand if I was reaching the end of my membership period and they were looking to retain me, but it's only been a few months. To be honest, the excessive asking is making me consider NOT renewing my membership next year.

On the contrary, I find MoMA's ask to be less, well, annoying because not only does it happen less frequently, but I get much more useful content from MoMA on a regular basis. Every month, I get a booklet from MoMA that tells me what is going on at the museum. It's a tall narrow book (it looks sort of like a Zagat guide in size) so it is easily portable in case you wanted to take it with you to the museum. In addition, as a member of their "Film Plus" program, I get one or two emails a month about specials screenings that I am able to attend gratis with that membership. These emails even go so far as to make it easy for you to RSVP. If you click on "YES" in the email, you get routed to where you can complete your RSVP. If you click on "NO," they know you are not attending and will stop contacting you about that event.

Now, fast forward to today, I check my mail and find two items from The Met. One is a monthly members calendar and the other is a fall bulletin. I find this confusing. Why mail me two things? Just send me one thing, and kill less trees. The fall bulletin is a large magazine-sized book but on the outside of it is yet another ask for money. I'm not so much bothered by the ask as much as the fact that this jacket on the outside of the fall bulletin was covering a wrap-around cover that featured the restored painting of Washington crossing the Delaware, which looks pretty freakin' cool. Why would you cover that? And apparently the fall bulletin is a lot of in depth information about the restoration of that painting. Very interesting stuff. How about putting the ask for money in the middle of the book? So while I'm perusing it and realizing how hard you guys work, I can think about donating before the year's end.

Instead, I'm annoyed because you keep asking me for money in all the wrong ways and compelled to blog about it!

I'm not a water snob but…

Sunday, July 17th, 2011

I'm not a water snob. A water snob, in my book, is a person who is very particular to which brand of water their allegiances lie. A water snob may in fact not drink any water out of any tap, regardless of how much fluoride may be in said tap water. Water snobs also probably don't accidentally drink any water in the shower, ever.

Now again, I'm not a water snob. I drink tap water if need be, and like it. New York City's water is actually pretty decent, but I've been known to drink tap water in other countries (except for Mexico; I was very careful to be a water snob there due to overwhelming concerns about bacteria in their water supply). I'm generally not picky about Pellegrino or tap at restaurants. And yes, I'm that person who chews on ice chips, well aware that they probably didn't use the filtered water for those.

When it comes to buying bottled water, however, I've become aware that some of it is better than others. Now, I'll preface this by saying that I try to avoid purchasing bottled water. I think the excess plastic is terrible for the environment and the PUR filter on my tap at home does the job pretty well.

That said, sometimes you need to buy bottled water. Normally, I stick with Poland Spring; usually, that's the only thing that's sold by the street vendors or underground subway vendors in New York City. Though apparently (shockingly!) it isn't available on the west coast, at all. I'm going to pretend (and who knows, maybe I'm right?) that its limited availability on the west coast is due to the company wishing to keep a small carbon footprint.

Then, there's the stuff bottled by big business — Dasani (bottled by Coca Cola), Nestle Pure Life, Smart Water. These are all okay. They aren't terrible, and will do okay in a pinch (like, for example, when you need more water than what can fit in your re-usable bottle). I have to say that Pure Life is pretty much like Poland Spring, but with a blue label; tastes fine, though, with the Nestle name, you would have expected it to have a chocolate flavor to it (not that we should aspire to have chocolate-tasting-water, gross!). Or maybe that's just me. I think about Nestle Toll House and Nestle Crunch when I think of their brand.

Finally, the good, the bad, and the ugly.

I'll start with the good and the bad: Fiji water. Fiji water comes in wonderful looking containers (more square than cylindrical) with beautiful flowers on the label. You imagine a lush island with the most amazing water you've ever tasted. What you don't imagine are military juntas selling off the region's most precious resource to us abroad while their own people have no access to it. Not a pretty picture. Great water, but it makes my heart hurt. I really don't want to be stressed when purchasing a bottle of water.

And lastly, there's the ugly — Evian. It's "naive" spelled backwards, which should be evidence alone that there's something not quite right about this water. I can't put my finger on it, but one thing is true, this water tastes like someone sucked the life out of it. I recently bought two large bottles because they were on sale; clearly, there was a very good reason for this.

So, in short, I think I'll just stick to re-filling my Camelbak BPF-free water bottle with what comes out of the tap and, unless I'm on the west coast, buying good old reliable Poland Spring water bottles as needed.

(Oh, and don't get me started on Propel and Vitamin Water – which is more sugar than water – and all the other "flavored" varieties. That's a blog post for another day.)

The High Cost of a Low Price

Friday, May 6th, 2011

Everyone (well, mostly everyone) knows that there's no such thing as a free lunch.

When it comes to low prices, I've learned the hard way that sometimes you get what you pay for.  The adage is true: if it looks too good to be true, it probably is.

I remember when I moved into my first real apartment post-college.  Unlike a lot of my peers, I had to pay for all of my initial expenses myself, with support from my boyfriend who I would be living with.  At the time, I worked for a nonprofit organization (for those that don't know, that's code for "not getting paid much") and he worked in theatre (also an industry where low salaries are not surprising).  This meant we had to get creative about how to spend money on furnishing an apartment.  Luckily, the apartment wasn't very large so there wasn't too much to buy.  We were also very fortunate that bed bugs were not widespread then; many of our furniture pieces then were found objects of unknown pedigree.

Though I tried very hard to find one on the street, nobody was getting rid of a pine wood antique chest of drawers like I desired for myself.  Some things just don't come easy.  Seeing no other way of affording a place to put my clothes, I ordered a filing cabinet made of particleboard that would happen to be large enough for my clothes and fit in our small bedroom.  For a short time, it did the job.  Until one morning, I was getting ready for work and the thing just crumbled.  If you can imagine a dresser imploding and collapsing upon itself, that's exactly what happened.

Now imagine this happening as you are trying to stealthily get ready for work while your boyfriend, who works evenings, is still trying to sleep.  Uncomfortable, annoying and totally frustrating, but it taught me that valuable lesson that sometimes paying more is actually worth it.  By the way, after that experience, I purchased a solid pine dresser for a large sum of money that I still use to this day.

I've noticed that, in this precarious economy, getting a good deal is huge.  In the past couple of years, flash sale websites like RueLaLa and Gilt Groupe have emerged and carved out a niche of offering high fashion looks for more affordable prices.  More recently, websites like Groupon and Living Social (and countless others) have gotten into the deal market letting you pay a lower prepaid price for services or goods.  In fact, even Facebook is starting it's own version of this (Facebook Deals) which is currently being tested in select markets.

When it comes to Groupon and Living Social, in particular, it seems pretty straightforward.  It's very similar to movie ticket vouchers; essentially, you purchase a voucher for a service or product in advance at less than full price to be used at a later date.  And again, like movie ticket vouchers, sometimes there are exclusions and restrictions.

For those of us accustomed to hoarding coupons (I'm not into extreme couponing, but I know how to get a good deal on clothes from time to time), the idea of restrictions is nothing new.  However, when it comes to online deals, it isn't the restrictions that are the problem.  From personal experience, I've found the problem is that either restrictions are not made clear or the retailer is not prepared for the influx of new business these deals may generate.

A friend of mine recently purchased a voucher for a night of karaoke and free pizza.  She called the location to make a reservation and, despite calling many times and leaving messages, she never got a response.  A voucher deal will not help your business if the new customers it attracts are left with a bad taste from the lack of conscientious customer service.

Similarly, I recently purchased two deals.  One was a magazine subscription for a popular women's magazine.  The second was a voucher for a wine shop in my neighborhood where I could purchase lots of wine for half the price.  Both deals have been less than ideal.  The magazine subscription delivered out of order for the first month but seems to have finally gotten on track now.  Meanwhile, the wine voucher was doomed from the start.  The deal site was unclear about what was or wasn't included in the voucher; this required several emails to purchasers (like myself) to offer a refund if this was unsatisfactory.  I thought this was a great effort by the deal site though; it showed that they were not intentionally misleading, but severely absent-minded.  Today I decided to redeem this deal as it's Mother's Day weekend and I'd like to bring a bottle of wine up to some of the festivities that are happening.

My boyfriend and I went to the wine shop near our house and gathered a selection of bottles.  The wine shop has an area near the entrance labeled "specials" where they feature many lower-priced wines.  We made sure to avoid this area as the voucher explicitly stated "no specials."  However, upon getting to the checkout counter, we are informed that many of our selections were indeed "specials."  Only at the counter were we informed that all prices ending in "7" were "specials."  And in fact, some of the bottles near the entrance labeled "special" were not in fact specially priced.  In order to make use of the deal, we had to gather some new selections and bring them back to checkout where we had to wait in line again.  This was a bit annoying, but reminded me that deals sometimes are not as good as they seem.

But what really bothered me was when we got to the checkout employee.  She had no idea how to handle the voucher I gave her and had to call over a colleague.  This to me signals that the store perhaps did not put much thought into the deal.  All of their staff should have been trained to expect lots of these vouchers and thus know how to input them into their system.  Over time, I've learned that being prepared is so instrumental in how others perceive you.  For a brand, this is huge.  And considering that a deal is used to bring in new customers, you want their first interaction to be positive so they will come back and also be an evangelist for your brand, recommending your product or service to others.  As many folks know, you only get one chance to make a first impression.

However, sites like Groupon and Living Social are also making a first impression with consumers.  If every time I purchase through one of these sites, I get a raw deal, chances are I will stop purchasing there.  And in fact, if location-based services take off, deals can be offered instead to everyone who checks in to a location or perhaps location-enabled users who are within range of the establishment.  There are lots of ways to engage customers and get them to try your product or service but at the end of the day, you want to retain customers and it seems the best way is through clear, consistent messaging and providing excellent customer service.